Recently in Premises Liability Category

April 12, 2011

How to Avoid Swimming Pool Accidents in Mississippi

main_b.jpg With warmer weather arriving in Mississippi, it's just about time to head for the local pool, or it you're lucky, to the pool in your own backyard. However, it you have young children you should remain ever vigilant around swimming pools.

Each year in the United States more than 1,000 children die in swimming-related accident, with approximately 33% of these deaths occurring in swimming pools. In the U. S. in 2000 over 3,400 people lost their lives in drowning accidents; this does not include people who drowned in boating accidents. These tragic fatalities are very painful for the families, and should not happen.

Near drownings can leave the victim with serious problems, including brain damage. A large amount of water, such as a pool, is not required to pose a drowning threat. Many drownings occur in locations with as little as 2 inches of water, such as:
• A bucket with water
• A sink
• A bath tub
• A toilet
• A puddle

Continue reading "How to Avoid Swimming Pool Accidents in Mississippi" »

October 1, 2010

Trouble Ahead for Premises Liability cases in Mississippi?

Premises Liability is a term of art used to describe a type of lawsuit when someone is injured on another persons, or businesses, property. The owner of a property has certain duties to people who come on that property. For example, assume you are staying at a hotel which has malfunctioning elevator. The property owner knows about the problem but neglects to fix it or even bother to tell his customers about the problem. Then you, after a long day of traveling, take the elevator to your room hoping to grab a good night's sleep only to have the elevator plunge several stories causing you to suffer serious bodily injury. The property owner had a duty to you, the customer, to provide a safe elevator. Because he breached his duty and it caused you harm, the hotel would be responsible for your harms and losses.

Recently, the Mississippi Supreme Court addressed two (2) premises liability cases on the same date. The two cases, Rebelwood Apartments v. Dwight English, et.al. and Double Quick v. Lymas, had both resulted in substantial verdicts for the Plaintiffs. In Rebelwood, the jury awarded $3,000,000.00 to the Plaintiffs and in Double Quick the Plaintiffs were awarded $4,000,000.00 but the trial judge reduced the non-economic damages amount to $1,000,000 due to the Mississippi Statutory Caps on non-economic damages resulting in a total verdict of $1,679,717.00.

The Supreme Court reversed and remanded (meaning the case will be tried again) the Rebelwood case. In Rebelwood, a young lady was found shot in her car at the Rebelwood Apartments. The Court noted that Rebelwood Apartments had a long history of criminal incidents in and around the property, which is a key factor in establishing liability. Jackson Police developed a suspect who confessed to killing the young lady at another location and then driving her to the Rebelwood Apartments. In other words, nothing happened at the Rebelwood Apartments.The trial court did not allow this evidence to go to the jury. The Supreme Court found that trial court committed error by not admitting this evidence. The Court also determined that the Plaintiff's premises liability expert, Jackson Police Officer Tyrone Lewis, gave false testimony when he stated that there was nothing to indicate that the young lady was killed in a place other than the Rebelwood Apartments.

In the Double Quick case, the Plaintiff Lyman was shot in the parking lot of the Double Quick located in Belzoni, Mississippi. Jackson Police Officer Tyrone Lewis was once again acting as the Plaintiff's expert witness. There was a huge dispute as to whether Lyman was the aggressor in the fight which occurred. The Plaintiff offered evidence showing that a "atmosphere of violence" existed in and around the Double Quick. Police reports showed that there were "14 fights, 33 thefts, 2 motor vehicle thefts, 39 either complaint or trouble calls" over the course of a five (5) year period. The Plaintiff's experts stated that this "violent atmosphere" led to the Plaintiff's damages.

However, the Supreme Court found that there was simply not enough evidence presented to show that the "violent atmosphere" caused the injury. The Court held that the testimony of the experts . The Plaintiff will not get a chance to retry this case.

Continue reading "Trouble Ahead for Premises Liability cases in Mississippi?" »